
The capacity to lead depends on trust. As a leader keeping trust alive is your primary responsibility for without it, you cannot lead. Trust is the air in a healthy organisational culture; it is the very currency of leadership. This is the secret that is hidden in plain sight โ it must be given how often leaders act in a manner that would indicate that they are unaware of this reality.
Organisational culture is the leaderโs responsibility. It is the primary focus of leadership bar none. For too long leaders have focused on strategy โ both the formation and execution and as important as this work is, it is not where the core responsibility of leadership rests.
Why is culture so important?
One reason is that it provides the context for all that is either good or bad in an organisation. Ultimately, it is the culture that will determine whether or not an organisation is able to sustain itself through both the calm and the storms that beset the journey. Yum Brands CEO, David Novak provides a relevant case study in underscoring this โsecretโ. Over the past 17 years, Yum stock has returned 16.5% compounded annually against the S&P 500โs 3.9% over that same period. Yum, which comprises of KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut have over 39 000 locations worldwide making it the largest restaurant company (measured by units) and this footprint has been built by the staggering measure that has seen Yum open a restaurant every 14 hours for the past 16 years.
Novak reveals a deep understanding of what is important when it comes to leadership. In the Fortune magazine, he was quoted as saying, โIf (our) people were asked, โWhatโs our inherent competitive advantage?โ theyโd say itโs our cultureโฆWhat really made the difference was the idea that if we trusted each other, we could work together to make something happen that was bigger than our individual capabilitiesโ. At the heart of Novakโs strategy was to build teams that operate on trust. Novak goes as far as saying that because of this trusting culture Yum has attracted talent from companies such as Coca-Cola, General Electric, and Procter & Gamble. The right people join because they see something that is worth belonging to; something they want to contribute towards and be a part of โ it is a matter of culture.
As mentioned but worth highlighting further, culture is the soil from which adaptive intelligence is grown โ not a strategy. The response to meeting the challenges of tomorrow is a cultural one and not a strategic one. Understanding this ought to be all the incentive that any leader needs in order to ensure that they build a culture that will help ensure adaptability. This is an insight that emerges from evolutionary biology and is a lesson to be taken seriously by leadership.
If it is this obvious that culture is so important, why is it that it seems beyond the grasp of so many leaders?
Leaders have been told and conditioned to look elsewhere. They have been told that the really important stuff is that which can be measured by the current metrics and all that matters is the bottom line. In a one-dimensional frame of reference this is true, however, the link between delivery on the bottom line and culture is what has been โlostโ in this one-eyed view on what really matters.
Culture has been left to Human Resources to โget sortedโ or has been outsourced or worse still, reduced to sporadic events designed for the purpose of boosting morale or making all things right. Culture emanates from the top โ from leadership. No amount of sloganeering or rhetoric will substitute for how the attitude and actions of the leader impacts on organisational culture. In Novakโs case at Yum, he centered his focus on recognition and fun. His office is a wall-to-wall photo gallery of pictures of him meeting employees from around the world. Novak explains, โPeople want to see the CEOโs office, and when they come in, they understand whatโs important in our companyโ. He also understood the importance of having fun in doing what you do and so fun became a central mantra in building the corporate culture at Yum. Fun at work, whilst an oxymoron to an older generation, is central to the working requirements of a younger generation. Too many leaders hear this talk and immediately default to a cynical โthatโs not how things work in the real worldโ type of response. But it can be, and Yum is living proof.
How, as a leader, do you start this kind of journey?
The temptation is to look for a quick fix, a Band-Aid type of approach. That is a little like wanting to get fit but only doing 30 minutes exercise a month. It simply doesnโt work. Shaping the โrightโ (for your organisation) culture starts with a clear idea of what it is you want that culture to be. It sounds obvious and is, yet I am amazed at how many times leaders lack intentionally when it comes to organisational culture.
The culture they have is more a result of a default than intentionally. There are instances when that may work for you but the lack of intentionally means that you donโt really know โwhy something works or notโ. This is then always dangerous ground to be on. Novakโs โclear ideaโ was that through effective and engaged teams, Yum would achieve success. Everything he then did would reflect this philosophy that people and teams were what mattered most. What that looked like and how it was built would be context specific but there was a clear and unmistakable underpinning philosophy that guided the activity.
The interesting thing about this was that Novak believed that this journey was first and foremost an, โinside-outโ one. In other words, it started with the individual and that โinner-workโ preceded โouter-workโ. This insight and understanding is the exception and not the rule when it comes to corporate leadership. It is framed by an understanding that you lead โout of who you areโ โ a mantra we speak about a great deal in TomorrowToday. Leadership skills and expertise that are marooned from authenticity and character soon get exposed. The question posed by Goffee and Jones in their book title, โWhy should anyone be led by you?โ โ is a good one and whilst skill sets are important in the leadership equation, character is more so. Novak believes that you are not fit to lead a team until youโve worked hard on yourself. Yum leaders are encouraged to practice reflective exercises and relational evaluations and Novak himself leads the way. That is how you build authentic organisational culture when as a leader you practice what you preach; when you do what is deemed good for others to do. Again, it all seems kind of obvious doesnโt it, and yetโฆ
It would appear that there might be more than one secret that is hidden in plain sight. An understanding that culture matters most; that our people are our culture; that people work in in teams and the currency of all this is trust; that being intentional about paying attention to what matters most is โ well obvious; that first and foremost it involves inner-work; and that, as the leader, it all starts with you.
โIf only it were that simpleโ you might be thinking but I want to suggest it is that simple. Our HR language and processes have often got in the way of what is straightforward and obvious. The fixation with measurement and the coupling of that with reward and recognition have served to skew everything to the point where we have lost sight of what is really important and how best to get that done. Novak and the Yum story reminds us that it can be done and more importantly, it can be done in a context where there is both complexity and global reach. Novak is quick to admit that they havenโt yet fully translated all this to every corner of their operation and that much work still needs to be done. Yet somehow that recognition in itself speaks volumes.
As a leader, you might need to ask yourself some serious questions and if there is a failure of culture within your work environment, look no further than yourself. It is a tough call on leaders but then again, who said leadership was easy?


This is so true — neurologically where there is no trust there is disgust. Disgust is the opposite emotion of trust. However, I believe 1) trust is the “foot-in-the-door” of leadership; what really separates leaders after that is 2) vision and exceptional 3) competence (experience, skill, IQ). Thanks for a great article.
Hi Ian, I would add EQ to the list. ๐