Partnering with customers is a trend that I’m a huge advocate of. The new world of work demands that companies actively engage with and enter into mutually beneficial relationships with customers. Companies that create and encourage channels allowing customers and staff to engage in one on one meaningful relationships will pull ahead of the competition. I’ve just come across a great example of co-creation (a spin off from crowdsourcing). In co-creation a company builds an intimate relationship with a group of it’s customers to work closely with it in coming up with new ideas and innovations.
Read more about crowdsourcing here:
Onions & Parfait
When social media grows up
Crowdsourcing enhancing the power of people
Venessa Wong of Bloomberg Business week has written a great article on how Unilever is making the most of this collaborative consumer model. You can read Vanessa’s article below or visit Business week
Co-Creation: Not Just Another Focus Group
To launch Twist, a new men’s fragrance in its global Axe brand, Unilever turned to a preapproved crowd of eager young amateurs for helpBy Venessa Wong
In July 2008, Unilever executives convened 16 regular young men and women from around the world at a meeting in New York. Why? To tap them for ideas for a new global fragrance for Axe, a brand of men’s body spray, antiperspirant, and shower gel. The company had previously experimented with consumer-driven product development for local launches, but never for one on such a large scale.
The young adults had been assembled by Face, a London-based firm that helps companies innovate through co-creation. Face runs two online communities: Headbox, for young adults, and Mindbubble, for women. Each group has about 7,000 members, all eager to opine on what brands should do next. For each commercial project, Face invites a small number of members to work as paid collaborators, with compensation levels depending on the project. It’s a new way to answer the question of how to harness an unwieldy crowd to a business’ advantage.
Co-creation is more fluid than focus groups, says Face Chief Executive Andrew Needham, who helped to start the company in 2004. Presented with a brief, Needham’s participants are asked to develop an idea from scratch, while focus groups mainly offer feedback on ideas or prototypes that have already been prepared. “Often consumers take you to places that you would never thought of going to had you used more traditional research methods,” he says.
TWIST: FRAGRANCE PANEL’S FRESH IDEA
David Cousino, global category director of Unilever’s consumer marketing insights group, based in London and Rome, agrees. Unilever started working with Face in 2007 to develop an Axe variant for Spain. “Consumers want to be engaged with brands more closely and we as marketers must do that,” he says. The challenge, he adds, lies less in finding passionate consumers than in hiring the right team to lead them. Marketers must be prepared to relinquish creative control rather than steer participants towards favored, often predictable, outcomes.To manage the launch of a new fragrance in the global Axe brand, Face tapped a group of 16 with an active interest in Axe and other health-and-beauty products from its youth community. The participants then met in New York in 2008 to be briefed about the brand and asked how they might tackle the concept of “freshness.” Their answer? To develop a fragrance that transforms throughout the day. They named it “Twist.” The concept was run by the Headbox community for feedback, won a thumbs-up, and was then approved by Unilever. Axe fragrance designer Ann Gottlieb spent five months developing the fragrance with Swiss perfume-and-flavor company Firmenich. Twist launched on the market in late 2009. Sales results are as yet unavailable, but Needham says the product and advertising are testing well with consumers.
“We couldn’t believe that the stewards of the brand hadn’t talked about how fragrance works until now,” says Unilever’s Cousino. “Sometimes it takes someone who isn’t as close to the category of business to break those filters away and show what they think is interesting.”
While co-creation is just another tool in a marketer’s bag of tricks, Cousino expects Unilever to use the process in future global launches. “Consumer market insight teams and marketers now know that consumers will always have a place in the innovation work stream,” he says.
Venessa Wong is an innovation and design writer for Bloomberg BusinessWeek.
Dear Dean,
I would personally claim that co-creation was a precursor to crowdsourcing, at least in popularity of using the term, but that’s an academic discussion. Contrasting the article above however, I recommend reading a recent Harvard Business Review blog posting on “One Size Does Not Fit All in Innovation (and Never Will)”: http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2010/04/one_size_does_not_fit_all_in_i.html. Though I am strong advocate of it myself, using consumer/customer involvement is not an innovation panacea. You have to know where it works out and where other methods may yield more “innovative” results.
If you or anyone else would like to follow up on this subject, I’m available at @eebystrom on Twitter as well as on the LinkedIn link above.